Well, not exactly. At least not yet. But there is an incipient movement to create a constitutional right to adequate nutrition. Some progressive folks in India think it’s time the right to food is recognized as fundamental to human existence. The challenge is how to actually guarantee adequate food, leading some to suggest that the effort is an empty gesture. Just because a “right” has been enshrined as such does not mean there is an effective mechanism for ensuring compliance.
We live in world where millions go hungry each and every day, and far too many right here in America, where we produce enough food annually to feed the world. I heard a radio interview just this morning where the interviewee observed that the Michigan crop of just about everything will be especially abundant this season. What are the socio-ethical implications of such abundance when so many are starving?
Jesus fed the five thousand with five loaves and two fish. Laying aside the seemingly supernatural aspects of that gospel story, there is something more at work here. In a world where scarcity is the engine that drives the economy, it is good to recall Walter Brueggeman’s observation that scarcity in the Kingdom of God is unknown, that in fact there is only abundance.
Do we therefore create shortages as a matter of economic policy? I am not suggesting that policymakers actually set out to manufacture scarcity. But in a world that clearly has the capacity to feed everybody, why can’t we?